top of page

What Modifier 25 Actually Means

Per American Medical Association (CPT® definition):

A significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management (E/M) service by the same physician or other qualified healthcare professional on the same day of a procedure or other service.

In plain English:

You performed:

  1. An E/M service and

  2. A procedure on the same date

And the E/M was:

  • Above and beyond

  • Not just the pre-procedure assessment

  • Not already included in the procedure

Where Modifier 25 Is Used

Modifier 25 is used on:

  • E/M codes only

    • 99202–99215 (office/outpatient)

    • 99281–99285 (ED)

    • 99221–99223 (hospital inpatient)

    • 99234–99236 (observation)

    • etc.

It is never appended to the procedure code.

The Core Rule Most People Get Wrong

Every procedure already includes a “built-in” E/M.

That includes:

  • History focused on the procedure

  • Brief exam related to the procedure

  • Decision to perform a minor procedure (0 or 10 day global)

If your documentation only supports that work —
Modifier 25 is NOT appropriate.

When Modifier 25 Is Appropriate

It is appropriate when the E/M includes:

  • Evaluation of additional complaints

  • Management of chronic conditions

  • Medication management unrelated to procedure

  • Extensive medical decision making beyond the procedure

  • Work that would have stood alone if no procedure were done

Ask this compliance question:

If the procedure were canceled, would the E/M still be billable?

If yes → likely 25
If no → do not append

Facility Outpatient Claims

Hospitals also use Modifier 25 on facility E/M codes when appropriate.

However, facilities must follow:

  • CMS OPPS rules (for Medicare)

  • NCCI edits

  • Payer-specific outpatient guidelines

Under Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), documentation must show the E/M was medically necessary and separate from procedural work.

Common Real-World Scenarios

Appropriate Example

Patient presents with:

  • Chest pain

  • Hypertension management

  • Receives IV push medication

The evaluation of chest pain + management decision making supports a separate E/M.

Modifier 25 appropriate.

NOT Appropriate Example

Patient presents for:

  • Laceration repair
    Provider documents:

  • Focused exam of wound

  • Decision to suture

That evaluation is inherent to the procedure.

Modifier 25 NOT appropriate.

Top Audit Triggers

Modifier 25 is heavily audited because it increases reimbursement.

High-risk patterns:

  • 25 appended to nearly every E/M

  • High-level E/M + minor procedure combo

  • ED overuse

  • Template-driven documentation

  • Same diagnosis on E/M and procedure without separate rationale

Many RAC and payer audits focus specifically on 25.

Modifier 25 vs Modifier 57 (Critical Difference)

Modifier 25:

  • Used with minor procedures (0 or 10 day global)

  • Applies to same-day E/M

Modifier 57:

  • Used when E/M results in decision for major surgery (90-day global)

Do not confuse them.

Modifier 25 vs Modifier 59

Modifier 25:

  • E/M vs procedure

Modifier 59:

  • Procedure vs procedure (distinct procedural services)

Completely different purposes.

Documentation That Supports Modifier 25

Your note should clearly show:

  • Separate complaint OR

  • Separate medical decision making OR

  • Separate assessment and plan elements

Best practice:

  • Separate header or paragraph for E/M

  • Clear assessment and plan distinct from procedure note

High-Risk Specialties for Modifier 25

  • Emergency Medicine

  • Urgent Care

  • Primary Care

  • Dermatology

  • Orthopedics

  • Pain Management

These specialties frequently perform minor procedures same day.

Financial Impact

Modifier 25:

  • Allows payment of both E/M and procedure

  • Without it, E/M may be bundled

  • Incorrect use can trigger:

    • Recoupments

    • Extrapolated audits

    • Fraud allegations if patterned

Medicare & NCCI Considerations

Under CMS and the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI):

  • Edits may bundle E/M with procedures

  • Modifier 25 bypasses bundling only when criteria met

  • Medical necessity is always required

Improper use can lead to:

  • Claim denial

  • Post-payment review

  • Overpayment demand

Best Practice Compliance Checklist

Before appending Modifier 25, confirm:

  • E/M is medically necessary

  • Documentation supports separate work

  • Work is above usual pre/post service care

  • Diagnoses support separate services

  • Audit risk considered

  • Not automatically appended by system

The Truth About Modifier 25

It is not:

  • A revenue tool

  • An automatic append

  • A way to maximize reimbursement

It is:

  • A compliance-sensitive modifier

  • A documentation-dependent decision

  • One of the most scrutinized modifiers in outpatient billing

Modifier -25 Facility ED & Observation Quick Reference

Confused about when Modifier -25 is appropriate for facility outpatient encounters? This quick reference breaks down Emergency Department and Observation scenarios so you can code with confidence and reduce audit risk.

Subscribe to get access

Thanks for submitting!

Document.pdf
Document.pdf
Document.pdf
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page